Discussion on politics, current events, government cheese, and so much more.
Monday, October 5, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
- climate change (1)
- environment (1)
- History (1)
- Presidential Election (1)
- Worldviews (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(190)
-
►
July
(28)
- Vietnamese Police Maul 2 Priests, 500,000 Protest ...
- U.S. Adviser's Blunt Memo on Iraq: Time 'to Go Hom...
- Lee Iaccoca
- Onstar has it's Limitations
- Ted Nugent Making Way Too Much Sense
- The Capital Hill Obama Card--What's in your Wallet...
- Then & Now
- Soldiers tell of Iraq Horrors
- Bush Administration Debated Using Military in Terr...
- Baton Rouge Police and Free Speech
- A Sound Economy
- Political Groove
- The USA Founded on "Biblical Principles"?
- Questions about Meltdown (From Confero)
- World Domination?
-
►
July
(28)
2 comments:
Interesting, thanks for sharing.
My thinking may be outside orthodox Natural Law thinking (or maybe not), but it seems to me, what he is talking about is an example of how natural law is practical as well as moral: Things work better when they are used according to their nature, when you respect the nature of a thing.
Cows weren't made to eat corn, chickens weren't meant to eat the feces of other chickens, none of the above were meant to live packed together on concrete or in tiny cages, and man shall not live on processed corn alone.
Abuse nature and what do you get? human obesity, rampant diabetes, mad cow, salmonella, ruined soil, crappy tasting non-nutritious food and –-eventually—- a starving populace.
Isn't there a passage in the Old Testament where God says, "What? My way is not good enough?"
Post a Comment